If correct, this means that a few billion people were needlessly given a higher dose of a product whose toxicities are dose-dependent, in clear violation of the most basic medical ethics.
Results like this make me think that the product isn't effective at all. It's like the studies showing surgical masks just as effective as n95 respirators. It's because neither work at all.
Results like this make me think that the product isn't effective at all. It's like the studies showing surgical masks just as effective as n95 respirators. It's because neither work at all.
Which means that NO dosage is the best option, by far.
If people are "hesitant" about even a half-dose, how are they going to be persuaded?
https://tnc.news/2022/10/11/treat-vaccine-hesitancy/
Why should they be persuaded when all the "vaccines" are dangerous?
Depends whether they've been following the media, or whether they wait for the knock on the door...
Appropriately designed, honest, accurately done and reported, transparent research would be a good start, of course.
Instead of Phase One we just do Phase None
It's called streamlining.
This study makes me think of Green Eggs And Ham.
https://www.songlyrics.com/dr-seuss/green-eggs-and-ham-lyrics/
Thanks for highlighting this, interesting read and good analysis and commentary.