OMG this article is priceless. Thank you for the humor. I needed a laugh. Not that I miss your deeper point. Science has become in all ways the new orthodox religion, with all the trappings. (1) Unquestioned metaphysical assumptions (like the possibility of observer-independence, the isolability of variables, etc.), (2) A process by which to divine truth; (3) Priests, true believers, preachers, and heretics; (4) Excommunication (cutting funding, blacklisting from journals); (5) An esoteric language comprehensible only to initiates; (6) a system for the indoctrination of youth; (7) legendary saints and martyrs (Newton, Einstein, Galileo); (8) Moral and ethical teachings.... I have a list of about 20 but I'll stop there.
One of the approximately 50 article drafts I started was a comparison of the principles of the scientific method vs SCIENCE, so I personally would very much like to see the rest of your list :) (in order to potentially pillage it (with attribution for the ones I don't have))
Speaking of books, may I send you a review copy of my upcoming book, The Coronation? Chelsea Green is the publisher. If so, you can email me at charles dot eisenstein at gmail.
The same as deaths resulting from big pharma drug use means they are working. These arrogant bozos would never admit that their garbage causes death and serious injuries. Their profits matter to them above all else, not your health or life.
Although you have to admit that some of them are so insane that it is difficult to explain them away as merely artifacts of maintaining your good standing in Fauci's Benevolence
So, I’ve also been flummoxed by these ludicrous statements/conclusions of vaccine safety and benefit in these studies and reports when literally all of the data point otherwise, and I’ve started to ask myself: is what we're witnessing a self-imposed thinly veiled smoke screen these authors are using in order to be able to get their papers published? We’re all familiar with the canceling and ghosting of academic papers that don’t abide by the approved narrative. Is this now the new paradigm they are forced to be operating under? First and foremost, they must acknowledge “safe and effective“ and then describe all adverse reactions/findings as being “rare“ regardless of reality. But it seems that if they do so, then the actual findings and data are allowed to be published. It strikes me as an odd form of Struggle Session where the authors are forced to contradict their data and findings by nonsensically stating the Party lines ("safe/effective/benefits outweigh risks/rare adverse occurrences"), and yet/therefore they are allowed to publish the data that so very obviously contradicts the Party line. Is this a new fractured reality that is being imposed upon us??
That is probably what is going on in at least a substantial portion of these ridiculous obsequious homages to the golden calf.
Once they do include these silly turds though, it is fair game to treat them as written to the conventional standard of academic literature that the write up of a study only includes the study's data/facts & analysis of the study info itself, so we can treat these lines as such :))
I absolutely agree – they must be called out harshly! I’m just trying to understand why I am suddenly seeing so many different published papers with the same ridiculous Struggle Sessions statements included against the contradictory findings. Thank you for doing all the hard work of so articulately calling them out. This has been a longer, harder road to expose the truth than I ever imagined it would be. So grateful there are people like you leading the charge :D
A wonderful article. I needed this to know how safe these marvellous synthetic genetic substances really are. The logic by which their efficacy and safety is evidenced is just as magical and mysterious as the proffered $cientific mechanism explaining how their holy healing properties are achieved at the cellular level. I will however decline the shock and awe experience of receiving these substances into my own body as I already joined the placebo group cohort and would not want to spoil the rest of the clinical trial.
OMG this article is priceless. Thank you for the humor. I needed a laugh. Not that I miss your deeper point. Science has become in all ways the new orthodox religion, with all the trappings. (1) Unquestioned metaphysical assumptions (like the possibility of observer-independence, the isolability of variables, etc.), (2) A process by which to divine truth; (3) Priests, true believers, preachers, and heretics; (4) Excommunication (cutting funding, blacklisting from journals); (5) An esoteric language comprehensible only to initiates; (6) a system for the indoctrination of youth; (7) legendary saints and martyrs (Newton, Einstein, Galileo); (8) Moral and ethical teachings.... I have a list of about 20 but I'll stop there.
Thanks sm :)
One of the approximately 50 article drafts I started was a comparison of the principles of the scientific method vs SCIENCE, so I personally would very much like to see the rest of your list :) (in order to potentially pillage it (with attribution for the ones I don't have))
Ha ha OK. Most of it is in my book Climate: A New Story. (The book is a serious departure from the dominant narrative). You can read that chapter here: https://charleseisenstein.org/books/climate-a-new-story/eng/in-science-we-trust/.
Speaking of books, may I send you a review copy of my upcoming book, The Coronation? Chelsea Green is the publisher. If so, you can email me at charles dot eisenstein at gmail.
Excellent 🫵🏼🤷♂️
The same as deaths resulting from big pharma drug use means they are working. These arrogant bozos would never admit that their garbage causes death and serious injuries. Their profits matter to them above all else, not your health or life.
They need to make sure they write those conclusions so their fauci funding doesn't dry up.
Although you have to admit that some of them are so insane that it is difficult to explain them away as merely artifacts of maintaining your good standing in Fauci's Benevolence
Right, like maybe they're so brainwashed that another conclusion would not even enter their mind.
The first paragraph is a thing of beauty
So, I’ve also been flummoxed by these ludicrous statements/conclusions of vaccine safety and benefit in these studies and reports when literally all of the data point otherwise, and I’ve started to ask myself: is what we're witnessing a self-imposed thinly veiled smoke screen these authors are using in order to be able to get their papers published? We’re all familiar with the canceling and ghosting of academic papers that don’t abide by the approved narrative. Is this now the new paradigm they are forced to be operating under? First and foremost, they must acknowledge “safe and effective“ and then describe all adverse reactions/findings as being “rare“ regardless of reality. But it seems that if they do so, then the actual findings and data are allowed to be published. It strikes me as an odd form of Struggle Session where the authors are forced to contradict their data and findings by nonsensically stating the Party lines ("safe/effective/benefits outweigh risks/rare adverse occurrences"), and yet/therefore they are allowed to publish the data that so very obviously contradicts the Party line. Is this a new fractured reality that is being imposed upon us??
That is probably what is going on in at least a substantial portion of these ridiculous obsequious homages to the golden calf.
Once they do include these silly turds though, it is fair game to treat them as written to the conventional standard of academic literature that the write up of a study only includes the study's data/facts & analysis of the study info itself, so we can treat these lines as such :))
I absolutely agree – they must be called out harshly! I’m just trying to understand why I am suddenly seeing so many different published papers with the same ridiculous Struggle Sessions statements included against the contradictory findings. Thank you for doing all the hard work of so articulately calling them out. This has been a longer, harder road to expose the truth than I ever imagined it would be. So grateful there are people like you leading the charge :D
Maybe we can get Steve Kirsch to do a secret survey of study authors to find out lol
A wonderful article. I needed this to know how safe these marvellous synthetic genetic substances really are. The logic by which their efficacy and safety is evidenced is just as magical and mysterious as the proffered $cientific mechanism explaining how their holy healing properties are achieved at the cellular level. I will however decline the shock and awe experience of receiving these substances into my own body as I already joined the placebo group cohort and would not want to spoil the rest of the clinical trial.
You’re not alone Howard .