OMG this article is priceless. Thank you for the humor. I needed a laugh. Not that I miss your deeper point. Science has become in all ways the new orthodox religion, with all the trappings. (1) Unquestioned metaphysical assumptions (like the possibility of observer-independence, the isolability of variables, etc.), (2) A process by which to divine truth; (3) Priests, true believers, preachers, and heretics; (4) Excommunication (cutting funding, blacklisting from journals); (5) An esoteric language comprehensible only to initiates; (6) a system for the indoctrination of youth; (7) legendary saints and martyrs (Newton, Einstein, Galileo); (8) Moral and ethical teachings.... I have a list of about 20 but I'll stop there.
The same as deaths resulting from big pharma drug use means they are working. These arrogant bozos would never admit that their garbage causes death and serious injuries. Their profits matter to them above all else, not your health or life.
So, I’ve also been flummoxed by these ludicrous statements/conclusions of vaccine safety and benefit in these studies and reports when literally all of the data point otherwise, and I’ve started to ask myself: is what we're witnessing a self-imposed thinly veiled smoke screen these authors are using in order to be able to get their papers published? We’re all familiar with the canceling and ghosting of academic papers that don’t abide by the approved narrative. Is this now the new paradigm they are forced to be operating under? First and foremost, they must acknowledge “safe and effective“ and then describe all adverse reactions/findings as being “rare“ regardless of reality. But it seems that if they do so, then the actual findings and data are allowed to be published. It strikes me as an odd form of Struggle Session where the authors are forced to contradict their data and findings by nonsensically stating the Party lines ("safe/effective/benefits outweigh risks/rare adverse occurrences"), and yet/therefore they are allowed to publish the data that so very obviously contradicts the Party line. Is this a new fractured reality that is being imposed upon us??
A wonderful article. I needed this to know how safe these marvellous synthetic genetic substances really are. The logic by which their efficacy and safety is evidenced is just as magical and mysterious as the proffered $cientific mechanism explaining how their holy healing properties are achieved at the cellular level. I will however decline the shock and awe experience of receiving these substances into my own body as I already joined the placebo group cohort and would not want to spoil the rest of the clinical trial.
OMG this article is priceless. Thank you for the humor. I needed a laugh. Not that I miss your deeper point. Science has become in all ways the new orthodox religion, with all the trappings. (1) Unquestioned metaphysical assumptions (like the possibility of observer-independence, the isolability of variables, etc.), (2) A process by which to divine truth; (3) Priests, true believers, preachers, and heretics; (4) Excommunication (cutting funding, blacklisting from journals); (5) An esoteric language comprehensible only to initiates; (6) a system for the indoctrination of youth; (7) legendary saints and martyrs (Newton, Einstein, Galileo); (8) Moral and ethical teachings.... I have a list of about 20 but I'll stop there.
Excellent 🫵🏼🤷♂️
The same as deaths resulting from big pharma drug use means they are working. These arrogant bozos would never admit that their garbage causes death and serious injuries. Their profits matter to them above all else, not your health or life.
They need to make sure they write those conclusions so their fauci funding doesn't dry up.
The first paragraph is a thing of beauty
So, I’ve also been flummoxed by these ludicrous statements/conclusions of vaccine safety and benefit in these studies and reports when literally all of the data point otherwise, and I’ve started to ask myself: is what we're witnessing a self-imposed thinly veiled smoke screen these authors are using in order to be able to get their papers published? We’re all familiar with the canceling and ghosting of academic papers that don’t abide by the approved narrative. Is this now the new paradigm they are forced to be operating under? First and foremost, they must acknowledge “safe and effective“ and then describe all adverse reactions/findings as being “rare“ regardless of reality. But it seems that if they do so, then the actual findings and data are allowed to be published. It strikes me as an odd form of Struggle Session where the authors are forced to contradict their data and findings by nonsensically stating the Party lines ("safe/effective/benefits outweigh risks/rare adverse occurrences"), and yet/therefore they are allowed to publish the data that so very obviously contradicts the Party line. Is this a new fractured reality that is being imposed upon us??
A wonderful article. I needed this to know how safe these marvellous synthetic genetic substances really are. The logic by which their efficacy and safety is evidenced is just as magical and mysterious as the proffered $cientific mechanism explaining how their holy healing properties are achieved at the cellular level. I will however decline the shock and awe experience of receiving these substances into my own body as I already joined the placebo group cohort and would not want to spoil the rest of the clinical trial.