My uncle was jabbed and boosted. Died of lung clots and cardiac arrest in Maine. Death certificate states .. COVID. I’m sure this is quite common for profit and to hide jab/cardiac relations.
In both the Pfizer and Moderna clinical trials, the vaccines started to show excess cardiovascular deaths compared to placebo by the 6 month follow-up, while there were no excess deaths at the 1 month follow-up, strongly indicating that most vaccine-related deaths are delayed by a few months or more. This same increase around September 2021 (suggesting delayed vaccine-related deaths) is also seen in the CDC's non-COVID death data, which someone assembled on a month-by-month graph recently. This seems to be very consistent with what you are showing?
I don't know about most deaths being delayed, but there does seem to be a subset of deaths that take time to manifest.
The vaccine trials were not large enough, and had a very biased population (they excluded way too many types of ppl), to be able to extrapolate something this specific. Also, there were deaths in the trial that were simply unreported, or claimed to be unrelated to the vaccine.
I always wonder, what data do we have that are more reliable / scientifically valid than the clinical trials (which showed that mRNA vaccines kill 4 people for every 3 saved, even during the worst Alpha wave)? Why do you think the establishment never talks about the clinical trial MORTALITY results even though clinical trials are the "gold standard"- it's because those results are absolutely disastrous. OTOH, when they compare vaccinated vs unvaccinated outside of the randomized double-blind clinical trials, there are all sorts of inherent biases favoring the vaccinated such as "healthy vaccine user effect" and biases related to doctors knowing who is and isn't vaccinated, etc., and this biased data is used to push the vaccine.
Also, the datasets I've seen that track long-term deaths (not VAERS which is designed to focus only on immediate events) all seem to show a much larger spike of deaths a few months or more after vaccination, rather than immediately after. Personally, the fact that both clinical trials also showed this trend really convinces me, plus this totally lines up with my own real-world observations. Do you know of datasets that show the opposite trend, where a large spike of deaths occurs right after vaccination and then the effect fizzles out?
Besides VAERS, YellowCard, EudraVigilance, Israel MoH survey, the zogby poll that found something like 30% of ppl developed a new condition within I forgot how many days of vaccination but it was pretty short term ;)
Ok, but aren't those "safety monitoring" systems only designed to capture short-term events, with the (self-serving) assumption that "any vaccine-associated side effects will take place within a week or so". Please note, I definitely believe that immediate side effects are quite common with the mRNA vaccines, and also that there is an unprecedented amount of deaths shortly after mRNA vaccination (as compared to flu vaccination etc). But what I am saying is that the overall evidence points to the MAJORITY of mRNA vaccine-related deaths being delayed a few months or more- all LONG-TERM datasets seem to suggest this, and it really matches my real-world observations (which admittedly aren't very scientific but do mean something). Also, just going by common sense, if the deaths were commonly occurring right afterwards, wouldn't it be impossible to hide in spite of all the censorship? Whereas when the deaths occur months later, they simply say "no proof this was related to the vaccine".
My own cardiogenic shock episode in January of 2021, could possibly have been avoided if access to my physician hadn't been blocked for months by corporate gatekeepers obeying the dictates of public health authorities and corrupt politicians.
Shortness of breath and chest pain are symptoms of Covid, they told me when they refused to allow me to see my doctor. "go and see the Covid team" they suggested. they never offered any "negative test result will get you an appointment." All they said was that no doctor would be allowed to see me for those symptoms.
By some miracle, they got my heart beating after the cardiac arrest, and were able to remove the breathing tube just a few hours after complete respiratory collapse.
Could there be an s-protein component involved with the large blood clot inside my heart that caused the "widow maker" myocardial infarction?
Who knows? Maybe that strangely persistent severe "bronchitis" that came on in February of 2020 was Covid, maybe not.
One aspect that seems very plausible to me, is role played by the persistent denial of care and treatment during the lockdowns and access restrictions.
All that it would have taken to save me from that cardiac arrest and heart tissue damage, would have been a tiny hint of a suspicion by my wise old MD. According to the cardiologist that resuscitated me, that blood clot was too extensive to have been caused by the cardiac arrest; he opined that it had been growing for a while, but could not determine precisely how long, with any degree of confidence.
My point is not to bore you with details of one man's experience, it's to remind us all that denial of care takes many forms and has more consequences than can be reduced to a simple temporal adjacency or even the ingestion of experimental gene-expression interventions.
Counting from the top... chart #12 Cardiogenic by Gender.. color key for 2018 should be purple not yellow.. it takes me a good while to absorb the info so details are easier to fix on.. love the charts and graphs and of course the research, thanks!! :~)
I'm also having issues posting new stories to Substack and editing text from previous posts. This started about a week ago. I appreciate anyone who can offer any fixes or give me any idea what might be happening.
My uncle was jabbed and boosted. Died of lung clots and cardiac arrest in Maine. Death certificate states .. COVID. I’m sure this is quite common for profit and to hide jab/cardiac relations.
In both the Pfizer and Moderna clinical trials, the vaccines started to show excess cardiovascular deaths compared to placebo by the 6 month follow-up, while there were no excess deaths at the 1 month follow-up, strongly indicating that most vaccine-related deaths are delayed by a few months or more. This same increase around September 2021 (suggesting delayed vaccine-related deaths) is also seen in the CDC's non-COVID death data, which someone assembled on a month-by-month graph recently. This seems to be very consistent with what you are showing?
I don't know about most deaths being delayed, but there does seem to be a subset of deaths that take time to manifest.
The vaccine trials were not large enough, and had a very biased population (they excluded way too many types of ppl), to be able to extrapolate something this specific. Also, there were deaths in the trial that were simply unreported, or claimed to be unrelated to the vaccine.
I always wonder, what data do we have that are more reliable / scientifically valid than the clinical trials (which showed that mRNA vaccines kill 4 people for every 3 saved, even during the worst Alpha wave)? Why do you think the establishment never talks about the clinical trial MORTALITY results even though clinical trials are the "gold standard"- it's because those results are absolutely disastrous. OTOH, when they compare vaccinated vs unvaccinated outside of the randomized double-blind clinical trials, there are all sorts of inherent biases favoring the vaccinated such as "healthy vaccine user effect" and biases related to doctors knowing who is and isn't vaccinated, etc., and this biased data is used to push the vaccine.
Also, the datasets I've seen that track long-term deaths (not VAERS which is designed to focus only on immediate events) all seem to show a much larger spike of deaths a few months or more after vaccination, rather than immediately after. Personally, the fact that both clinical trials also showed this trend really convinces me, plus this totally lines up with my own real-world observations. Do you know of datasets that show the opposite trend, where a large spike of deaths occurs right after vaccination and then the effect fizzles out?
Besides VAERS, YellowCard, EudraVigilance, Israel MoH survey, the zogby poll that found something like 30% of ppl developed a new condition within I forgot how many days of vaccination but it was pretty short term ;)
Ok, but aren't those "safety monitoring" systems only designed to capture short-term events, with the (self-serving) assumption that "any vaccine-associated side effects will take place within a week or so". Please note, I definitely believe that immediate side effects are quite common with the mRNA vaccines, and also that there is an unprecedented amount of deaths shortly after mRNA vaccination (as compared to flu vaccination etc). But what I am saying is that the overall evidence points to the MAJORITY of mRNA vaccine-related deaths being delayed a few months or more- all LONG-TERM datasets seem to suggest this, and it really matches my real-world observations (which admittedly aren't very scientific but do mean something). Also, just going by common sense, if the deaths were commonly occurring right afterwards, wouldn't it be impossible to hide in spite of all the censorship? Whereas when the deaths occur months later, they simply say "no proof this was related to the vaccine".
True, all valid points, it's a big mess out there :)
COVID JABS.
Dumb question: can you point me to where you download the raw data?
Email me ashmedai@substack.com
email me ashmedai@substack.com
My own cardiogenic shock episode in January of 2021, could possibly have been avoided if access to my physician hadn't been blocked for months by corporate gatekeepers obeying the dictates of public health authorities and corrupt politicians.
Shortness of breath and chest pain are symptoms of Covid, they told me when they refused to allow me to see my doctor. "go and see the Covid team" they suggested. they never offered any "negative test result will get you an appointment." All they said was that no doctor would be allowed to see me for those symptoms.
By some miracle, they got my heart beating after the cardiac arrest, and were able to remove the breathing tube just a few hours after complete respiratory collapse.
Could there be an s-protein component involved with the large blood clot inside my heart that caused the "widow maker" myocardial infarction?
Who knows? Maybe that strangely persistent severe "bronchitis" that came on in February of 2020 was Covid, maybe not.
One aspect that seems very plausible to me, is role played by the persistent denial of care and treatment during the lockdowns and access restrictions.
All that it would have taken to save me from that cardiac arrest and heart tissue damage, would have been a tiny hint of a suspicion by my wise old MD. According to the cardiologist that resuscitated me, that blood clot was too extensive to have been caused by the cardiac arrest; he opined that it had been growing for a while, but could not determine precisely how long, with any degree of confidence.
My point is not to bore you with details of one man's experience, it's to remind us all that denial of care takes many forms and has more consequences than can be reduced to a simple temporal adjacency or even the ingestion of experimental gene-expression interventions.
Counting from the top... chart #12 Cardiogenic by Gender.. color key for 2018 should be purple not yellow.. it takes me a good while to absorb the info so details are easier to fix on.. love the charts and graphs and of course the research, thanks!! :~)
The reasons for the increase is...either "just because" or unknown and never to be known.
I'm also having issues posting new stories to Substack and editing text from previous posts. This started about a week ago. I appreciate anyone who can offer any fixes or give me any idea what might be happening.