I have heard many in the medical field say that the science of mRNA is amazing. The potential for medical advancements is beyond imagination. However, it was too young and unproven to be forced on all humanity. I believe that trust in the medical field has been badly damaged. I don't know what it will take to gain that trust again.
That is just one of the many the worries of Geneticist Alexandra Henrion-Caude that this almighty cluster"""" will lead to a total rejection of the technology.
Surprisingly quite a lot of that has stuck, but if you are around & have the spare time could you answer this question ? I have heard some experts stating that the choice of using spike protein is dangerous - others adding that it is the best choice to ensure a profitable business model. I just wondered if there were any alternatives that you know of that would be safer or better etc. It appears to me that if there were other options available then it could perhaps be argued that it was at the very least irresponsible to have made the choice that they did.
The short answer is yes, there are safer (and also more effective too) alternatives to the full-length spike protein chosen for the covid vaccines, particularly the nucleocapsid protein. This is really a far more complex topic than can be properly articulated here in short form.
It is important to caveat that there are safety probs with the lipid delivery vehicle and the "hacking your own cells" part of the tech that are not resolved and likely will require many years to improve to the point of being acceptable.
I have heard many in the medical field say that the science of mRNA is amazing. The potential for medical advancements is beyond imagination. However, it was too young and unproven to be forced on all humanity. I believe that trust in the medical field has been badly damaged. I don't know what it will take to gain that trust again.
That is just one of the many the worries of Geneticist Alexandra Henrion-Caude that this almighty cluster"""" will lead to a total rejection of the technology.
Surprisingly quite a lot of that has stuck, but if you are around & have the spare time could you answer this question ? I have heard some experts stating that the choice of using spike protein is dangerous - others adding that it is the best choice to ensure a profitable business model. I just wondered if there were any alternatives that you know of that would be safer or better etc. It appears to me that if there were other options available then it could perhaps be argued that it was at the very least irresponsible to have made the choice that they did.
The short answer is yes, there are safer (and also more effective too) alternatives to the full-length spike protein chosen for the covid vaccines, particularly the nucleocapsid protein. This is really a far more complex topic than can be properly articulated here in short form.
It is important to caveat that there are safety probs with the lipid delivery vehicle and the "hacking your own cells" part of the tech that are not resolved and likely will require many years to improve to the point of being acceptable.
Thank you - that will do fine for me - more power to you David & take care.
Ask any doctor who advises you to get vaccinated to kindly explain this to you :))
If they can't, then you will know for certain that they understand the vaccines no better than you do :)
I am only trying to cover the design of the vaccines themselves here. I have written about vax probs in multiple other articles. :)