Thank you for all of this! 🙏💕 The past trials of vaccines already on the childhood vaccination schedule were often not tested against a placebo, but tested against another vaccine. I wonder if Pfizer has defined "placebo" in this trial... And now I'm reading the other comments where you say they defined saline placebo. Barefoot healer might be onto something, what is the concentration of salts in their saline solution....?
There was a story last year that indicated that they were not using a saline solution, but had used another, different kind of vaccine in some of their trials.
Sadistic demons. Its not a clinical trial, its a human experimentation with a biopweapon by the evil murderers
"Mengeles From the FDA Mass Murder Advisory Committee Discuss Clinical Trials for Babies: A 17-Month-Old Baby Received a Second Dose Despite Multiple Seizures From the First"
I have noticed this, as well. There seem to be far too many adverse reactions in the placebo group considering all they're getting is salt water.
One aspect that never seems to be discussed, especially by the likes of Pfizer, is the potential cross-reaction these gene therapies have, or could have, with many of the other vaccines that are given to children. Who knows whether or not the placebo group is receiving something the has a negative cross-reaction with ingredients in other childhood vaccines these kids already received?
Did these babies stop their other vaccines during the trial? I doubt it. There is not a month that goes by without an injection it seems during that timeframe on the CDC Schedule, so how would they separate those adverse events from these?
Although I suspect there are many bad motives there is perhaps a problem with all these injections that it would be all too evident in a genuine trial against placebo which was the active arm: indeed you might even get “the placebo effect” in the active arm because participants would know that had got something. I doubt whether in most cases a double-blind placebo trial if such a thing were ever to occur would be effective, or that any properly scientific testing of this kind of product is at all possible.
Why haven't I trusted big pharma for the last 3 decades? For the reasons above and more. There is no reason to vaccinate a baby or a child when the drug makers cannot prove that vaccinations are better than not vaccinating. And since they will never tell us what exactly is in any of their drugs, vaccines and mRNA gene therapy injections, I will never use their products...not even baby aspirin which has aluminum listed as an ingredient. I hope I live to see the day when these murderers are hanging from the rafters.
For adults, intramuscular injection of saline solutions cause these same adverse events, see: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1702797/v1. Figure 1 illustrates a reproducible pattern of adverse events for intramuscular injection of saline solutions in COVID-19 clinical trials for adults.
For infants and toddlers, if the saline solution volume is not proportionally adjusted for the child's body size, they are receiving a proportionally higher dose of saline solution. The model predicts correspondingly higher frequencies of adverse events (see: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1502384/v1 for reference) in proportion to the higher dose.
Haven't had time yet to plow through this totally,
but am I getting this right... the new(??) trick is: use rat poison* as the "placebo" and magically, your product looks like the mildest stuff ever?
Well the trick seems not to be that new in principle. I have heard from someone who claimed to be an ex employee of the PEI (Paul Ehrlich Institut in Germany) that they have been giving "placebos" lacking only viral material, but still containing adjuvants, in trials where then e.g. the level of autoimmune problems were declared "not significantly above placebo level".
One would need to compare with the onset of the same symptoms against a group that has neither; vaccine or saline. Young kids are always sick from something, there is no need to do anything special for them to exert a multitude of symptoms. Also looking at the time from injection to onset, would yield some information if the two are related...IMHO
My understanding is that in vaccine type trials, the placebo is another vaccine - flu or something (a "safe" vaccine, which I've learned are not safe at all) rather than saline.
We knew about 2/3rds of participants withdrew at various stages, so that would skew the results. And checking the pretrial notes the dosing was indeed like Schrödingers Cat, there but not there at the same time with no way of knowing. Ie goal seeking. Garbage in, garbage out.
Did you find results of the troponin subgroup? I'm guessing they buried that, pun intended.
I raised this question months ago asking WTF, you already know you will be permanently destroying myocardia?
Shameful blatent unblinding to blur any inevitable life changing damage. Expect skeletal defects too as well as cancers, personality disorders and so on. I don't expect some to live very long and many will be quite sickly. Shame on the parents.
"Dependent upon safety and/or immunogenicity data generated during the course of this study, it is possible that dose levels may not be started, may be terminated early, and/or may be added with dose levels below the lowest stated dose."
"Phase 2/3 Obtaining Serum Samples for Potential Troponin I Testing
If testing of troponin I levels in individuals who did not receive BNT162b2 indicates that troponin I level could be a reliable indicator of potential subclinical myocarditis, obtaining serum samples for potential troponin I testing during the period of increased risk of clinical myocarditis may help characterize the absence/presence and frequency of subclinical myocarditis. To assess, an additional group of participants will be included: 5 to <12 years: 750 participants randomized 2:1 to receive BNT162b2 10 µg or placebo, and 500 participants 12 to <16 years of age: open-label receipt of BNT162b2 30 µg"
"At the 6-month follow-up visit, all participants will be unblinded. Participants who originally received placebo will be offered the opportunity to receive BNT162b2 as part of the study. Participants who originally received placebo and become eligible for receipt of BNT162b2 or another COVID-19 vaccine according to local or national recommendations prior to the 6 month follow-up visit (Visit 5 or 405) (detailed separately and available in the electronic study reference portal) will have the opportunity to receive BNT162b2 (10 µg or 3 µg) based on age at the time of vaccination."
A team in the United Kingdom is conducting a trial of a new COVID-19 vaccine (charmingly called ChAdOx1 nCOV-19) and they are comparing it not to a saline injection but to a vaccine against meningitis...
I reached out to the team conducting the UK trial and was told the reason they changed their mind from using a saline injection to using the meningitis vaccine was that saline injections don’t cause a sore arm, which might unwittingly reveal to the volunteers what group they are in. No soreness after the injection? You may have received a placebo, which could alter your behaviour and thus add a nasty variable to explain away the results of the trial.
This official explanation, however, is questionable. Injecting a saline solution into a muscle can be associated with side effects, as many vaccine trials have demonstrated.
Thank you for all of this! 🙏💕 The past trials of vaccines already on the childhood vaccination schedule were often not tested against a placebo, but tested against another vaccine. I wonder if Pfizer has defined "placebo" in this trial... And now I'm reading the other comments where you say they defined saline placebo. Barefoot healer might be onto something, what is the concentration of salts in their saline solution....?
There was a story last year that indicated that they were not using a saline solution, but had used another, different kind of vaccine in some of their trials.
Sadistic demons. Its not a clinical trial, its a human experimentation with a biopweapon by the evil murderers
"Mengeles From the FDA Mass Murder Advisory Committee Discuss Clinical Trials for Babies: A 17-Month-Old Baby Received a Second Dose Despite Multiple Seizures From the First"
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/mengeles-from-the-fda-mass-murder?s=w
I have noticed this, as well. There seem to be far too many adverse reactions in the placebo group considering all they're getting is salt water.
One aspect that never seems to be discussed, especially by the likes of Pfizer, is the potential cross-reaction these gene therapies have, or could have, with many of the other vaccines that are given to children. Who knows whether or not the placebo group is receiving something the has a negative cross-reaction with ingredients in other childhood vaccines these kids already received?
Did these babies stop their other vaccines during the trial? I doubt it. There is not a month that goes by without an injection it seems during that timeframe on the CDC Schedule, so how would they separate those adverse events from these?
I’m beginning to suspect these aren’t “experimental” vaccines at all. I suspect these dark forces know exactly what they’re doing.
It is perhaps of relevance that prior to Covid there was zero history of vaccines ever having been trialled against placebo:
https://www.icandecide.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/ICAN-Reply-1.pdf
https://www.bmj.com/content/365/bmj.l4291/rr-37
Although I suspect there are many bad motives there is perhaps a problem with all these injections that it would be all too evident in a genuine trial against placebo which was the active arm: indeed you might even get “the placebo effect” in the active arm because participants would know that had got something. I doubt whether in most cases a double-blind placebo trial if such a thing were ever to occur would be effective, or that any properly scientific testing of this kind of product is at all possible.
https://www.bmj.com/content/371/bmj.m4924/rr-3
Why haven't I trusted big pharma for the last 3 decades? For the reasons above and more. There is no reason to vaccinate a baby or a child when the drug makers cannot prove that vaccinations are better than not vaccinating. And since they will never tell us what exactly is in any of their drugs, vaccines and mRNA gene therapy injections, I will never use their products...not even baby aspirin which has aluminum listed as an ingredient. I hope I live to see the day when these murderers are hanging from the rafters.
For adults, intramuscular injection of saline solutions cause these same adverse events, see: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1702797/v1. Figure 1 illustrates a reproducible pattern of adverse events for intramuscular injection of saline solutions in COVID-19 clinical trials for adults.
For infants and toddlers, if the saline solution volume is not proportionally adjusted for the child's body size, they are receiving a proportionally higher dose of saline solution. The model predicts correspondingly higher frequencies of adverse events (see: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1502384/v1 for reference) in proportion to the higher dose.
Haven't had time yet to plow through this totally,
but am I getting this right... the new(??) trick is: use rat poison* as the "placebo" and magically, your product looks like the mildest stuff ever?
Well the trick seems not to be that new in principle. I have heard from someone who claimed to be an ex employee of the PEI (Paul Ehrlich Institut in Germany) that they have been giving "placebos" lacking only viral material, but still containing adjuvants, in trials where then e.g. the level of autoimmune problems were declared "not significantly above placebo level".
* (slight exaggeration)
One would need to compare with the onset of the same symptoms against a group that has neither; vaccine or saline. Young kids are always sick from something, there is no need to do anything special for them to exert a multitude of symptoms. Also looking at the time from injection to onset, would yield some information if the two are related...IMHO
Cheers
L.
My understanding is that in vaccine type trials, the placebo is another vaccine - flu or something (a "safe" vaccine, which I've learned are not safe at all) rather than saline.
We knew about 2/3rds of participants withdrew at various stages, so that would skew the results. And checking the pretrial notes the dosing was indeed like Schrödingers Cat, there but not there at the same time with no way of knowing. Ie goal seeking. Garbage in, garbage out.
Did you find results of the troponin subgroup? I'm guessing they buried that, pun intended.
I raised this question months ago asking WTF, you already know you will be permanently destroying myocardia?
Shameful blatent unblinding to blur any inevitable life changing damage. Expect skeletal defects too as well as cancers, personality disorders and so on. I don't expect some to live very long and many will be quite sickly. Shame on the parents.
"Dependent upon safety and/or immunogenicity data generated during the course of this study, it is possible that dose levels may not be started, may be terminated early, and/or may be added with dose levels below the lowest stated dose."
"Phase 2/3 Obtaining Serum Samples for Potential Troponin I Testing
If testing of troponin I levels in individuals who did not receive BNT162b2 indicates that troponin I level could be a reliable indicator of potential subclinical myocarditis, obtaining serum samples for potential troponin I testing during the period of increased risk of clinical myocarditis may help characterize the absence/presence and frequency of subclinical myocarditis. To assess, an additional group of participants will be included: 5 to <12 years: 750 participants randomized 2:1 to receive BNT162b2 10 µg or placebo, and 500 participants 12 to <16 years of age: open-label receipt of BNT162b2 30 µg"
"At the 6-month follow-up visit, all participants will be unblinded. Participants who originally received placebo will be offered the opportunity to receive BNT162b2 as part of the study. Participants who originally received placebo and become eligible for receipt of BNT162b2 or another COVID-19 vaccine according to local or national recommendations prior to the 6 month follow-up visit (Visit 5 or 405) (detailed separately and available in the electronic study reference portal) will have the opportunity to receive BNT162b2 (10 µg or 3 µg) based on age at the time of vaccination."
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04816643
it is possible that the phenomena is caused by vaccine shedding.
unvaccinated babies could be kept in the same room as vaccinated babies. in a confine environment, shedding is possible.
also as well, shedding from vaccinated nurses could very well skew the result.
SEPT 2022 UPDATE
Thread about unusual placebo SAE trends over time..
https://twitter.com/ClareCraigPath/status/1569958383704313856
**********
Referencing this excellent substack post:
https://philharper.substack.com/p/pfizers-own-data-showed-vaccine-creates
**********
https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-health/placebos-used-vaccine-trials-do-not-please-everyone
A team in the United Kingdom is conducting a trial of a new COVID-19 vaccine (charmingly called ChAdOx1 nCOV-19) and they are comparing it not to a saline injection but to a vaccine against meningitis...
I reached out to the team conducting the UK trial and was told the reason they changed their mind from using a saline injection to using the meningitis vaccine was that saline injections don’t cause a sore arm, which might unwittingly reveal to the volunteers what group they are in. No soreness after the injection? You may have received a placebo, which could alter your behaviour and thus add a nasty variable to explain away the results of the trial.
This official explanation, however, is questionable. Injecting a saline solution into a muscle can be associated with side effects, as many vaccine trials have demonstrated.