Debunking The Recent JOWMA "Top 10" Vaccine Propaganda Ad
This would be more aptly named "Ten Compelling Reasons to Never Again Listen to the Medical Community"
This is an updated version
Here is the ad:
1. Rating: Mostly False
The best-case scenario for these vaccines is that they provide temporary protection from severe covid disease for about 6 months before rapidly waning into deep negative territory on cases (per the Public Health England reports released every two weeks); and to functionally nonexistent on severity by 9 months especially for those with covid risk factors (per a recent massive Swedish observational study). And this “best-case scenario” is only for those who make it to the promised land of 14 days post-2nd dose and don’t subsequently suffer a vaccine SAE that is equal to or worse than covid itself.
The vaccines are extremely detrimental to your immune system generally. (I hope to write a dedicated article about this.)
Regardless, there are a plethora of prophylaxes and treatments for covid that carry none of the vaccine’s safety problems and are generally far more effective. So no, the vaccine is not necessary for your health, and there is a not-insignificant chance that the vaccine will prove injurious to you, as will be explored further addressing the rest of the spurious claims of this ridiculous Pravda piece.
2. Rating: Mixed with Deceptive Contextual Framing
Covid can indeed result in poor outcomes, especially with the current vaccine-induced variants that accumulate with exponentially greater viral loads. But covid still is a remarkably stratified disease by age and health status. If you’re under 30 and healthy, covid does not (for now anyway) pose a discernable risk that sticks out above the background routine, everyday risks of living.
Long Covid is a massively exaggerated phenomenon, although for those genuinely afflicted with it, it can be debilitating. Long Covid in children is practically non-existent by data (at least 3 studies found essentially equal prevalence in children wo had and who didn’t have covid). And while there is zero functional data on vaccines and long covid, the thousands of doctors who legitimately treat covid (like the FLCCC and their affiliates) report that they practically never encounter long covid in a patient that was treated early and thoroughly when for covid when they had covid.
It is true that we don’t know much about potential long-term effects of covid (the same way we don’t know about long term effects of vaccines, which this ad pretends doesn’t exist). But, reassuringly, the clinical experience of the doctors who treat actually covid is that when covid is properly treated, the longer-term pathological components (that we are aware of) do not manifest.
In any event, the risk of covid means that you should seek basic, easily available prophylactic and early treatment options, which include things as basic as mouthwash (with CPC) and a PVP nasal rinse (betadine) and supplements like Vitamin D (which is basically 100% effective against severe covid at levels >50), in addition to a variety of highly effective medicines such as Ivermectin, Nitazoxanide, Fluvoxamine, Budesonide, and a bevy of others (take a look at the FLCCC protocols).
3. Rating: Propaganda + Delusion
Delta is not intrinsically far more contagious than other variants, a fact easily observable from the Public Health England data, where the Delta transmission rates were only a bit higher than other variants/original Wuhan strain for the first few months where Delta was the dominant variant in circulation. (JOWMA seems to think that the civilized world ends at America’s borders, judging by their consistent profound ignorance of even the most elementary data from countries other than the US, especially the UK.) The increased contagiousness is almost definitely caused by the volume of vaccinations by a “leaky” vaccine. We know from the Marek’s disease vaccine (in chickens) that a leaky vaccine can lead to the ascendance of “hotter” strains of a pathogen, with massively larger viral loads (and possessing enhanced lethality as well).
“[I]n areas with low vaccination rates” - this must be why Vermont (at the time this article is being written), the state with the highest vaccination rate in the US, has the highest case rate. Or why the most vaccinated jurisdiction in Ireland has the highest caseload. I can go on, but this is poppycock. There is no general correlation whatsoever between vaccination rates and reduction of any covid metric. The primary driver of covid geographically is seasonality, plain and simple, a bedrock tenet of viral epidemiology for decades. This contention is thus both illiterate and ignorant of the elementary data from around the US and around the world.
Vaccines have been shown by numerous studies to have reduced capacity against the primary “variants of concern”. This fact is also common sense, as the vaccines drive the evolution of variants to favor specifically those that carry mutations on the parts of the spike protein targeted by the vaccine that enable the variant to escape the vaccine-generated immunity more effectively. This is also a known bedrock principle of molecular epidemiology.
This final point is so delusional that it doesn’t even rise to the level of “junk science”, rather it is simply junk. JOWMA apparently does not believe in such basic scientific concepts such as “survival of the fittest” and microevolution. There are more than 50,000 identified covid variants to date. But only since the vaccine rollouts have a few variants gained such a degree of dominance anywhere. It is the vaccinated people who exert the selective evolutionary pressure that favors the emergence of increasingly transmissible and virulent variants. This has been emphatically proven by the Marek’s Disease vaccine, besides for being a practically self-evident axiom, that creating an environment that gives a massive advantage to variants that escape vaccine immunity would lead to the ascendance of such variants. This is anyway belied by the deluge of breakthrough covid cases everywhere. In the UK, the government – PHE – has documented that he case rate is higher in the vaccinated after about 6 months than the unvaccinated. This is cultist drivel, emblematic of the state of pathetic ignorance and lack of independent critical thinking by too many doctors and clinicians who simply regurgitate whatever is espoused by the health agencies and journals without regard for the underlying arguments.
4. Rating: 100% False
These vaccines do not inhibit transmission, nor were they ever demonstrated to do so in any serious trial. There are numerous studies that have documented the equivalent or greater viral loads and culturable virus in vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Furthermore, every heavily vaccinated country has had considerably more covid cases this year vs the same time last year.
5. Rating: Fearmongering Propaganda
Children do not require protection from covid. Period.
The “fact” that covid was among the top ten causes of death for pediatrics is a meaningless statistic. The relevant thing to know is how likely a child is to die from covid, not how likely compared to other vanishingly rare potential causes of death in a population that experiences almost no death statistically. We know that covid is far, far less of a threat to children than is the seasonal Flu/influenza, which should be enough to put this imbecilic nonsense to bed. Furthermore, the CDC’s stats are wildly inflated, as the definition of a covid death is literally any death that occurs in someone within 30 days of a positive covid test (and a few even beyond that boundary), which has led to the inclusion of asymptomatic covid cases being labelled as the COD things like gunshot victims and lightning strikes. This is a conscious and deliberate choice to try and make covid look more menacing to parents (take a look at the open-court testimony of Rhode Islands chief medical doctor about this).
Regarding MIS-C and Long Covid, both of these are wildly overexaggerated, and both are furthermore often (if not mostly) attributable to causes other than covid (such as reduced exposure to natural pathogens as a result of lockdowns, or the extreme mental/emotional trauma inflicted on children by the barbaric covid policies). Simply saying something is caused by covid does not make it so.
6. Rating: Misleading
Pregnant women are indeed at greater risk of covid complications. Pregnant women are also at increased risk from almost everything else too, including the vaccines. At any rate, what is relevant here is the absolute risk faced by pregnant women from covid, which is miniscule. Covid does not pose a serious risk to women in their twenties and thirties, who are (except for children) the safest demographic from covid generally. “3x greater risk” is meaningless when it is 3x about .0001 (=.0003), which is approximately the risk of severe covid in healthy 20’s & 30’s women.
The vaccines, it must be stressed, seem to be particularly dangerous to female fertility. The most widely documented vaccine side effect is menstrual dysfunction (of various sorts, including many that are horrifying and bizarre), where for instance a lone University of Chicago survey without marketing exceeded 140,000 (!!!!) submissions by women claiming to have experienced an unexpected post-vaccination menstrual issue (they were hoping to get 500). Furthermore, there are an abundance of reports of late-term pregnancy loss. (Properly analyzing the VAERS & other pharmacovigilance data requires its own series of articles.)
7. Rating: Laughable
The vaccine trials are a joke, riddled with methodological problems, incompetence, and outright fraud and lying about the results.
Many steps were simply disregarded in the rush to grant approval, such as basic pharmacokinetic studies to assess the biodistribution of the lipids, the toxicity of the lipids (especially the cationic ones), the biodistribution of the spike protein, the toxicities of the spike protein produced, and a whole assortment of other standard tests. This is especially egregious as we now know that the spike protein possesses numerous toxicities.
It is true that billions of vaccine doses have been administered. The problem is that the sheer volume of reported side effects has kept pace, and that is without factoring in the rampant suppression of adverse event reporting in almost every medical and healthcare institution. There is a massive surge in excess deaths worldwide that tightly correlates to vaccine deployment by demographic and time of vaccine administration.
Even the vaccine trials themselves failed to show a reduction in all cause mortality after six months. Furthermore, the vaccine trials were blown up after only a few months of observation, when the vaccine manufacturers vaccinated the control groups of the studies (!?!?!), eliminating the possibility (threat?) of any coherent long-term safety data that would undermine these absurd claims of vaccine safety.
8. Rating: Partly False and Fully Misleading
It is probably true that the majority of vaccine side effects are transient and minor. But that is irrelevant because the sheer volume of severe side effects is enormous by both safety standards for medical treatments, and more importantly, they are more likely than severe covid complications. And because covid is easily treated, practically 100% of vaccine side effects are already more than covid, because covid poses zero threat if properly treated early on. The fact that society has managed to suppress covid treatment does not excuse even minimal vaccine side effects.
The medical community has no idea if the routine systemic side effects are a sign of a healthy immune reaction. What other vaccines produce such side effects on such a large scale? The truth is that the medical community does not have the foggiest idea about the pathology of the vaccines after they’ve been injected, something sufficiently demonstrated by the fact that every specific claim vaccine proponents made about the vaccine pathology has been debunked (such as “it stays in your shoulder” or “spike is not dangerous”).
Severe vaccine side effects are not as rare as they are being made out to be, and are far, far more prevalent than covid complications. The medical community is by and large in full denial about the widespread carnage inflicted by these vaccines. Ask yourself: is there a realistic chance that the medical community will ever admit that the vaccines have significant safety issues, after they have committed every shred of credibility in the most public, definitive, and absolutist manner possible that anyone and everyone who even questions vaccine safety is a conspiracy theorist quack??
9. Rating: Mostly True
Unfortunately, because the government is populated and influenced by a combination of brainwashed people, brain dead people and diabolical people with comparatively few normal people, the sad truth may well be that the sufficient uptake of the vaccine by almost every holdout may well be necessary to return to as close to normalcy as we’re likely to get.
Vaccination makes you more dangerous to grandma though, because what the vaccine can do is hide a covid infection from someone by making it asymptomatic, which combined with the naïve belief that being vaccinated renders one “covid-free” will likely lead to more risky behavior and social interactions with grandma, leading to more covid. The surest guarantee for grandma’s safety is that you had covid already.
10. Rating: 100% True
See #9. And this has the bonus of being a potentially legitimate reason to subject yourself to the risks of the vaccine, depending on one’s specific circumstances.